To recall the learnings in my immediate prior post, there are 4 main elements for consolidation at date of acquisition:
- Basic combination of financial statements
- Adjustments for the fair values of assets and liabilities
- Goodwill – Balance of cost of investment less fair value (FV) of net identifiable assets
- Non-controlling interest (NCI)
For the purpose of this post, we will now focus on discussion on point number 3 and 4. While previous examples often equate Cost of Investment (COI) to be same value of acquiree’s Fair Value of Net Identifiable Assets (FVNIA), even after performance of the fair value adjustment exercise, this is not realistic. Often, when an acquisition or merger happens, acquirer or merger partners are expecting synergy to happen, which is when the combined entity is greater than the sum of all parts. For that, the acquirer is willing to pay a premium above acquiree’s FVNIA. For the purpose of consolidation, this is called “Goodwill”. FRS 103 defines “Goodwill” as ‘an asset representing the future economic benefits arising from other assets acquired in a business combination that are not individually identified and separately recognized’. From acquiree’s point of view, they also want a price as high as possible to give up control. On the flip side, its also entirely possible acquirer underpays for the acquisition that results in “Negative Goodwill”. A possible scenario for this to happen is when acquiree is in distress and owners are willing to cash out at a bargain to acquirer.
Goodwill
An important thing to note about Goodwill is it is subject to FRS 36 Impairment of Assets but not subject to amortisation. Following is an example of an acquisition in which the COI is 200 but acquiree’s FVNIA is only 170.
| A | B | DR | CR | Consolidated Bal. | |
| Goodwill on Conso | – | – | 30 | 30 | |
| Land | 400 | 150 | 50 | 600 | |
| Cost of Investment | 200 | – | 200 | – | |
| A/R | 200 | – | 200 | ||
| Bank | 10 | 20 | 30 | ||
| 810 | 170 | 860 | |||
| Share Capital | 550 | 100 | 100 | 550 | |
| Retained Earnings | 160 | 20 | 20 | 160 | |
| Loan | – | 50 | 50 | ||
| A/P | 100 | – | 100 | ||
| 810 | 170 | 860 |
Another important thing to note about Goodwill on acquisition date is if acquiree has any prior Goodwill not related to the acquisition, the treatment of this unrelated Goodwill should be to:
- Ignore it during calculation of Goodwill on Consolidation.
- Offset it against the reserves of the subsidiary before cancellation against COI
The net effect of doing this is to hide or pretend the unrelated subsidiary Goodwill isn’t there and refresh the Goodwill calculation back to zero for the purpose of calculating the present acquisition Goodwill at acquisition date. Following is a demonstration of how this pans out:
| A | B | DR | CR | Consolidated Bal. | |
| Goodwill on Conso | – | – | 30 | 30 | |
| Subsi Goodwill | – | 50 | 50 | – | |
| Land | 400 | 150 | 50 | 600 | |
| Cost of Investment | 200 | – | 200 | – | |
| A/R | 200 | – | 200 | ||
| Bank | 10 | 20 | 30 | ||
| 810 | 220 | 860 | |||
| Share Capital | 550 | 100 | 100 | 550 | |
| Retained Earnings | 160 | 70 | 50 | 160 | |
| 20 | |||||
| Loan | – | 50 | 50 | ||
| A/P | 100 | – | 100 | ||
| 810 | 220 | 860 |
As you can see from the example above, acquiree’s prior Goodwill of 50 is offset against the reserves first, then the acquiree’s FVNIA comes down to 170 which is then compared against the COI of 200 to get the Goodwill of Consolidation of 30.
Non-Controlling Interest (NCI)
We are now ready to move on to our next discussion, Non-Controlling Interest (NCI). NCI occurs when the acquisition is not a full 100% but acquirer has control. (How acquirer can gain control has been discussed before, but to simplify our discussion, we will assume any shareholding >50% is enough to gain control.) If for example, the acquisition is only for 80%, then the 20% belongs to shareholders outside of acquirer, also defined as Non-Controlling Interest (NCI). The consolidation exercise will still be on 100% basis as before, but 20% of net assets and profits will need to be allocated to NCI. FRS 110 governs the presentation of the NCI, which indicates that it must be presented as equity.
An important discussion of NCI is measurement. FRS 103 gives us 2 choices on how to measure NCI:
- Base on fair value (market price of shares)
- Proportionate share of acquisition date FVNIA
The main difference between these 2 methods is that the first method gives the entire consolidation exercise an additional NCI goodwill, calculated by taking the (market price of share * number of NCI share) and net against (NCI % * FVNIA). The second method just assumes NCI does not have a NCI Goodwill. In summary, the first method inflate the Goodwill on Consolidation and the NCI with an arbitrary figure derived from share price while second method don’t.
In current industry practice, most people use the second method and don’t use the first and for very good reasons.
- Firstly, NCI’s Goodwill really doesn’t add much value to calculations. On the contrary, it makes the entire consolidation exercise more complex that it should be by introducing share price as a variable. This makes any consolidation proof to require a record of the share price that was used.
- Secondly, not every company is listed and thus the choice of share price value used can be highly contentious and quite frankly, difficult to justify.
For simplicity (cause I am lazy), I will demonstrate how NCI is calculated using the second method. For this example, the acquisition is for 80% @ COI of 180. Land was fair valued to 250 from 200 with any future sale of land attracting a 20% tax rate.
| A | B | DR | CR | Consolidated Bal. | |
| Goodwill on Conso | – | – | 28 | 28 | |
| Land | – | 200 | 40 | 250 | |
| 10 | |||||
| Cost of Investment | 180 | – | 180 | – | |
| A/R | 100 | 10 | 110 | ||
| Bank | 60 | 10 | 70 | ||
| 340 | 220 | 458 | |||
| Share Capital | 200 | 100 | 80 | 200 | |
| 20 | |||||
| Retained Earnings | 60 | 50 | 40 | 60 | |
| 10 | |||||
| A/P | 80 | 70 | 150 | ||
| Deferred tax | – | – | 8 | 10 | |
| 2 | |||||
| NCI | – | – | 38 | 38 | |
| 340 | 220 | 458 |
Breakdown of consolidation working as follows:
| Fair Value Adj. Exercise | Amt | P%/NCI% | P/NCI |
| Increase in Land FV | 50 | 80% | 40 |
| 20% | 10 | ||
| 20% Deferred Tax on Land FV | (10) | 80% | (8) |
| 20% | (2) | ||
| Total FV adjustment | 40 | ||
| Add on: | |||
| Acquiree’s FVINA at acq. date | 150 | ||
| Acquiree’s FVINA after FV exercise | 190 | 80% | 152* |
| NCI’s share of FVINA | 20% | 38 | |
| Thus to derive Acquirer Goodwill: | |||
| Acquirer COI | 180 | ||
| Acquiree’s share of FVINA | 152* | ||
| Goodwill on consolidation | 28 |
All materials produced on this website, including this article, is based on author’s best interpretation of accepted accounting standards and his own experience. Any information bias, inaccuracies, misstatements, obsolesce are unintentional and should strictly not be held liable against the author. The author is not responsible for any losses, monetary or non-monetary, as a result of using these materials.